DJI’s donations of drones to local agencies raise questions from lawmakers

DJI’s donations of 100 drones to local agencies as part of their recently launched US Disaster Relief Program, raises questions from lawmakers.
DJI’s donations of drones raise questions from lawmakers
One month ago, DJI committed 100 drones to 40 Polizei, fire, and public safety organizations in 21 states as part of the US Disaster Relief Program to help fight COVID-19.
How these drones are now being used by public safety agencies is what Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee demand to know from the Ministerium für Innere Sicherheit.
Bloomberg reports that ‘several federal agencies have expressed concerns that the devices could be used for spying in the U.S. A claim that drone maker DJI has denied for the last couple of years. See Brendan Schulman’s interview for more information on this.
The lawmakers wrote in a letter addressed to Katharine Sullivan, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice that:
In response to the Coronavirus epidemic, DJI has donated drones to state and local law enforcement entities in the Vereinigte Staaten to purportedly assist with social distancing enforcement. Although federal law enforcement agencies have warned of potential information security concerns with DJI drones, it is not clear whether state and local law enforcement agencies are fully aware of these issues.
Ohio Representative Jim Jordan, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, and 13 other lawmakers signed the letter, in which they specifically ask for the following information:
1. A list of all state, local, territorial, and tribal law enforcement agencies receiving federal grant funding to purchase or operate DJI drones covering the period from January 1, 2017, to the present;
2. Please explain what policies and procedures grant recipients must have in place to receive federal support to purchase or operate DJI drones, including any restrictions and exemptions that apply;
3. Please explain whether any concerns about DJI drones have arisen during Department- wide UAS working group activities since January 1, 2017; and
4. Please explain whether the Department is monitoring DJI’s recent provision of drones to state and local law enforcement agencies during the coronavirus pandemic and what actions, if any, the Department is taking in response.
The information needs to be provided as soon as possible but no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 27th, 2020.
Over the last few years, a number of federal agencies have expressed concerns about DJI drones possibly spying on U.S. citizens. A claim that DJI has always strongly denied. The drone maker at one point hired the consultancy firm Kivu to investigate whether DJI drones could in fact send sensitive data back to China and thus be used as spying devices. The consultancy firm did not find any proof that DJI drones were used in this way.
Earlier this year the Department of the Interior stopped using DJI drones for all non-emergency flights after having worked for 15 months with the drone maker to develop a special ‘Government Edition’ for their drones, which was validated by NASA. The ‘Government Edition’ prevented any possibility of data being sent back to China and met the specification of the DoI. Again, See DJI’ Brendan Schulman’s interview for more background on this.
In a statement, DJI said that the purpose of the donations of drones to local agencies was to protect Ersthelferinnen und Ersthelfer and citizens. The drone maker added that:
“False claims that our drones spy on people or send data to China actually risk interfering with public safety efforts to protect people and communities.”
In a letter to the public safety agencies, that received the free drones, DJI said that their drones could be safely used and that the unmanned aircraft met security standards for critical infrastructure. In that letter from April 21st, DJI also said that the Datensicherheit concerns raised around their drones were ‘clearly motivated by political sentiment.
Bleiben Sie in Kontakt! If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews, then follow us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTubeund Instagram. Tipps einreichen Wenn Sie Informationen oder Tipps haben, die Sie mit uns teilen möchten, können Sie sie uns gerne mitteilen hier. Unterstützen Sie DroneXL.co: Sie können DroneXL.co unterstützen, indem Sie diese Links verwenden, wenn Sie Ihre nächste Drohne kaufen: Adorama, Amazon, B&H, BestBuy, eBay, DJI, Papageiund Yuneec. Wir erhalten eine kleine Provision, wenn Sie dies tun, ohne zusätzliche Kosten für Sie. Danke, dass Sie DroneXL helfen zu wachsen! FTC: DroneXL.co verwendet Partnerlinks, die Einkommen generieren.
Entdecken Sie mehr von DroneXL.co
Melde dich für ein Abonnement an, um die neuesten Beiträge per E-Mail zu erhalten.
VERSCHAFFEN SIE SICH GEHÖR
Die vorgeschlagene Gesetzgebung bedroht die Möglichkeit, Drohnen zum Vergnügen, zur Arbeit und zur Sicherheit zu nutzen. Die Allianz der Drohnen-Befürworter Schließen Sie sich uns an und fordern Sie Ihre gewählten Vertreter auf, Ihr Recht auf Fliegen zu schützen.
Erhalten Sie Ihr Part 107-Zertifikat
Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the Pilot-Institut. Wir haben Tausenden von Menschen geholfen, Flugzeug- und kommerzielle Drohnenpiloten zu werden. Unsere Kurse werden von Branchenexperten entwickelt, damit Sie die FAA-Prüfungen bestehen und Ihre Träume verwirklichen können.

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please Kontaktieren Sie uns first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the Allianz der Drohnen-Befürworter. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.
FTC: DroneXL.co ist ein Amazon Associate und verwendet Affiliate Links, die Einkommen aus qualifizierten Käufen generieren können. Wir verkaufen, teilen, vermieten oder spammen Ihre E-Mail nicht.
All of these “concerns” expressed by decidedly partisan politicians have been speculative. None of these allegations we have heard have been backed up by proof that any sensitive data whatsoever has ever been transmitted to ANY hostile foreign interests either for military or economic espionage. The DOD, DOT and others have access to most probing of signal analytic systems known to man. If evidence exists of Chinese “spying” it would not be the stuff of rumor and conspiracy theory, it would be front page news
Great work as always Haye!!