Georgia to Ban Chinese Drones in Major Security Push

Georgia Lawmakers Push Drone Regulations, Targeting Chinese Manufacturers and Public Safety
Georgia lawmakers are advancing comprehensive drone regulations through multiple bills, with bipartisan support focusing on national security and public safety concerns, according to state legislative documents. The measures would restrict both drone operations and procurement sources for state agencies, reports The Atlanta Journal Constitution.
House Bill 205, which received unanimous committee approval, would require the Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency to create an approved drone list for state and local government purchases. These drones must meet Federal Aviation Administration and U.S. Departamento de Defensa standards, with agencies given a three-year compliance window.
“There is no price tag on national security in our country,” said State Rep. David Clark, R-Buford, the bill’s primary author, citing concerns about Seguridad de los datos risks from leading drone manufacturers DJI and Autel, which have ties to the Chinese government.
A companion measure, Senate Bill 64, specifically targets drones under 55 pounds manufactured or assembled in China o Rusia.
State Sen. Ed Setzler, R-Acworth, who chairs the Science and Technology Committee, emphasized the strategic importance: “As UAVs become more and more systemically important to our nation’s entire stream of commerce, we need to limit the ability of malevolent actors such as China and Russia from having an outsized influence on our economy and collecting rich aerial data on our citizens.”
The economic impact could be significant. Georgia Geospatial Association drone chair Brody Baer noted that American-made alternatives typically cost substantially more than Chinese-manufactured drones, which currently dominate the commercial market.
The timing coincides with drone delivery expansion plans in Atlanta. Wing, a drone delivery company partnered with Walmart and DoorDash, recently demonstrated its 11-pound delivery drones to state legislators. The company positions its service as an efficient alternative to traditional delivery methods.
Additional measures include House Bill 58, which would prohibit drone flights within 400 feet of large ticketed events, and House Bill 156, designating the Department of Transportation as the authority over “vertiports” – specialized drone takeoff and landing facilities.
The legislative push follows recent drone activity concerns in Nueva Jersey, though the Casa Blanca clarified last month that these flights were FAA-authorized and included legitimate commercial, research, and hobbyist operations.
Descubra más de DroneXL.co
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
HAZ OÍR TU VOZ
La legislación propuesta amenaza su capacidad de utilizar drones por diversión, trabajo y seguridad. El sitio Alianza para la defensa de los drones Únase a nosotros y pida a sus cargos electos que protejan su derecho a volar.
Obtenga su certificado Parte 107
Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the Instituto Piloto. Hemos ayudado a miles de personas a convertirse en pilotos de aviones y drones comerciales. Nuestros cursos están diseñados por expertos de la industria para ayudarle a pasar las pruebas de la FAA y alcanzar sus sueños.

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please Contacto first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the Alianza para la defensa de los drones. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.
FTC: DroneXL.co es un Asociado de Amazon y utiliza enlaces de afiliados que pueden generar ingresos por compras calificadas. No vendemos, compartimos, alquilamos ni enviamos spam a su correo electrónico.
If security is on their mind then it kinda feels like your too late. What’s that too say in American drones are more expensive as the article states. They also didn’t say that it’s because your paying for a better product. Which is typically the reason for paying more for a product. I’m pretty sure every citizen or business in China has some connection with its government in some way. How many people and businesses in China work hard to better their situation and hopefully break away from government control. I heard it ain’t peaches like it is here boys. If I vote does that mean I have a connection to this government too? What if I work as a volunteer at a polling place or with a political party during an election year? At the speed of government with security issues it’s a good thing I can still bare arms. This is unfortunately a land of consumers. We want we buy we eat more than or fill. We don’t create or lead major industries anymore. We’re to lazy or just lazy enough to know China will make it cheaper and good for them in at least creating a fine product that is probably the best in the world. They could easily sell us inferior products or keep us 1 step behind them as. There people reserve the best of the best and we get seconds. Give recreational drone pilots and DIYers more flexibility and I promise they will close the technology gap quicker and create a product we all want to use. Something somewhere has to change my people. I’m first to admit it.