A study from Booz Allen Hamilton in partnership with PrecisionHawk concludes there has not been any unauthorized data transfer from DJI drones, that were previously used by the US government, to the Chinese drone maker or government. You can download the executive summary of the report ici.

No unauthorized data transfer from DJI drones back to China

News outlet The Hill reports that this study is the latest call into question allegations from several lawmakers who have pushed for federal agencies to stop using Chinese made drones over concerns that they might share data with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

In an interview, Brandon Schulman, DJI’s vice president of policy and affairs said:

That’s the allegation that we’ve seen the past two years or more repeated by policymakers and in some cases our competitors as a reason to enact policy that would take away the ability to choose which products to use in a mission. None of those have been accompanied by evidence or analysis demonstrating that there’s a factual basis behind the allegation.

In 2019, PrecisionHawk established its Unmanned Aerial Intelligence Technology Center of Excellence (UAS COE), which is backed by the cybersecurity expertise of leading government technology firm Booz Allen Hamilton.

Booz Allen Hamilton said that it has not found any evidence of unauthorized data transmissions in its analysis of three DJI drone models that at one point were used by the US government. The three specific DJI commercial drones that were examined in this report are the Government Edition , le Government Edition et le DJI Mavic 2. Enterprise.

PrecisionHawk stated that: the Booz Allen testing covered DJI’s Government Edition Mavic Pro and Matrice 600 Pro drones, as well as the Mavic 2 Enterprise. This security-focused testing did not identify data connections made by the drone platforms to DJI or Chinese servers. The testing did identify potential vulnerabilities associated with one or more of the three drone platforms that could be exploited or triggered by a threat source. Nearly all of those vulnerabilities require physical access to the drone itself, or for the attacker to be within direct radio range during specific operations. When drones are operated and managed by trusted and trained personnel, allowing for a trusted chain of control to be incorporated into standard operating procedures (SOPs), vulnerabilities requiring physical access can be significantly minimized.

DJI is the largest manufacturer of drones in the world and has long stated that no data is transferred from its drones to either the Chinese government or to the drone company itself. Opérateurs de drones have the option to store aerial images and videos from their drones on DJI’s servers but they do not have to do so. See Brendan Schulman’s interview for more background on this.

DJI responded by saying that:

Today, the UAS COE released an executive summary of the audit, which we encourage all customers to read fully. It is another independent validation of the security of DJI products following reviews by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. cybersecurity firm Kivu Consulting, U.S. , U.S. , and others. The audit is a critical step toward ensuring emerging is secure and able to be trusted for government and enterprise operations.

The audit found no evidence of data transmission connections between these drones and DJI, , or any other unexpected party. From our perspective, this important finding from an independent, globally recognized leader in cybersecurity indicates that DJI customers have control over the data they collect when using our drones, contradicting reports that data from DJI devices is surreptitiously routed to other parties.

Back in 2017, the stopped using DJI drones. And the Interior Department of the grounded its entire drone fleet temporarily in October last year.  The United States Department of the Interior started with a temporary grounding of all of its drones that were manufactured in China or contained Chinese made parts in October of last year. Early on in 2020, Interior Secretary David Bernhardt took things one step further and continued the temporary grounding of all of the agency’s drones.

In September, a bipartisan group of senators introduced legislation, that would stop all federal agencies from using drones that have been manufactured or assembled in China. More recently, Senator Martha McSally (Rep-AZ) proposed a bill that would prohibit any federal funding from being used to purchase drones manufactured in China. Neither of these two bills has moved out of committee according to The Hill.

The proposed bills and other actions from government bodies result from concerns of a new Chinese law that was introduced in 2017, that requires Chinese companies to transfer any data when requested for state intelligence work. Other companies that have seen increased pressure are Chinese telecommunication companies such as Huawei, ZTE, and the social media app TikTok.

Even though the allegations of unauthorized information sharing have been unsubstantiated, they are part of a larger push to eliminate the use of any Chinese made equipment by the US federal government.

Restez en contact !

If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews, then follow us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram or…

S'abonner à notre bulletin d'information quotidien sur les drones.*


Soumettre des conseils Si vous avez des informations ou des conseils que vous souhaitez partager avec nous, n'hésitez pas à nous les communiquer. iciSoutenez DroneXL.co : Vous pouvez soutenir DroneXL.co en utilisant ces liens lors de votre prochain achat de drone : Adorama, Amazon, B&H, BestBuy, eBay, DJI, Perroquetet Yuneec. Nous percevons une petite commission lorsque vous le faites, sans frais supplémentaires pour vous. Merci d'aider DroneXL à se développer ! FTC : DroneXL.co utilise des liens d'affiliation qui génèrent des revenus.

* Nous ne vendons pas, ne partageons pas, ne louons pas et ne spammons pas votre email, jamais. Nos courriels sont envoyés en semaine vers 17 h 30.

Photo: DJI


Découvrez plus de DroneXL.co

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

FAITES ENTENDRE VOTRE VOIX

Une proposition de loi menace votre capacité à utiliser des drones pour le plaisir, le travail et la sécurité. La Alliance pour la défense des drones Rejoignez-nous et dites à vos élus de protéger votre droit de voler.

Alliance pour la défense des drones
AGIR MAINTENANT
Suivez-nous sur Google News !

Obtenez votre certificat Part 107

Passez le test et envolez-vous dans les airs avec la Institut pilote. Nous avons aidé des milliers de personnes à devenir pilotes d'avion et de drones commerciaux. Nos cours sont conçus par des experts de l'industrie pour vous aider à passer les tests de la FAA et à réaliser vos rêves.

institut pilote dronexl

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2024. Tous droits réservés. Le contenu, les images et la propriété intellectuelle de ce site Web sont protégés par la loi sur les droits d'auteur. La reproduction ou la distribution de tout matériel sans autorisation écrite préalable de DroneXL.co est strictement interdite. Pour les autorisations et les demandes de renseignements, veuillez nous contacter first. Also, be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC : DroneXL.co est un associé d'Amazon et utilise des liens d'affiliation qui peuvent générer des revenus à partir d'achats qualifiés. Nous ne vendons pas, ne partageons pas, ne louons pas et ne spammons pas votre email.

Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo est rédactrice en chef et fondatrice de DroneXL.cooù il couvre toutes les actualités liées aux drones, les rumeurs DJI et rédige des commentaires sur les drones, et EVXL.copour toutes les informations relatives aux véhicules électriques. Il est également co-animateur de l'émission PiXL Drone Show sur YouTube et d'autres plateformes de podcast. Haye peut être contacté à haye @ dronexl.co ou à @hayekesteloo.

Articles: 4358

Laisser une réponse

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les spams. Découvrez comment les données de vos commentaires sont traitées.

fr_FRFrench (France)