DJI Mavic 4 Pro Test Photos and Clip Reveal Triple-Camera Design, Enhanced Cooling System

Fresh images shared by reliable Industrie des drones insider Jasper Ellens offer the clearest look yet at what appears to be the upcoming DJI Mavic 4 Pro, revealing several notable design changes from its predecessor. The photos show the unreleased drone alongside the DJI Air 3S in a sophisticated camera testing setup, providing valuable insights into DJI’s next flagship consumer drone.

Design Evolution and Thermal Management
The most striking feature of the alleged Mavic 4 Pro is its redesigned camera system, sporting a distinctive three-lens configuration housed in what appears to be a more substantial gimbal assembly compared to the Mavic 3 Pro. This setup likely incorporates the previously rumored 24mm, 70mm (or potentially 50mm), and 166mm equivalent focal lengths.
A significant addition to the design is a prominent heat sink positioned at the rear of the aircraft, suggesting DJI has prioritized thermal management for what is expected to be a more powerful imaging system. This focus on cooling aligns with the drone’s rumored capability to process high-resolution 100MP photos and advanced video formats.
Looking closely at the camera and gimbal setup, it appears that the camera on the DJI Mavic 4 Pro will be able to look straight down and up for more creative aerial images and footage.

Streamlined Aerodynamics and Safety Features
The test unit reveals more streamlined arms compared to the Mavic 3 Pro while maintaining the familiar folding mechanism characteristic of the Mavic series. Two fish-eye obstacle avoidance sensors are visible, along with an LED beacon mounted on top of the aircraft, indicating DJI’s continued emphasis on safety and regulatory compliance.
Interestingly, the test unit appears to lack the LiDAR sensing system found on the DJI Air 3S’s front section.

Professional Testing Environment
The leaked images show the drone’s camera system being evaluated alongside a DJI Air 3Sm, a Xiaomi smartphone and what appears to be a full-frame mirrorless camera. This professional testing setup, complete with precision alignment tools and light-controlling hood, indicates DJI is in the late stages of image quality optimization.
Market Implications
These latest revelations about the Mavic 4 Pro suggest DJI is pushing to further differentiate its professional consumer drone lineup. The enhanced cooling system and triple-camera array point to a device capable of more demanding imaging tasks, while the streamlined design maintains the portability that has made the Mavic series popular among professionals.

The apparent removal of the LiDAR system, if confirmed in the production model, could indicate a strategic decision to optimize the drone for specific professional use cases rather than attempting to include every possible feature. This approach could help manage the drone’s weight, which has implications for both flight time and regulatory compliance, particularly in markets like the European Union where drone weight categories affect operational requirements.
Industry Context
The timing of these test photos aligns with previous reports suggesting an April 2025 release date for the Mavic 4 Pro. The sophisticated nature of the testing setup and the presence of comparison cameras indicate DJI is conducting detailed image quality evaluations, a crucial step before finalizing the product for market release.
These developments come as the consumer drone market continues to mature, with professionals demanding increasingly sophisticated imaging capabilities in portable platforms. The Mavic 4 Pro’s apparent focus on enhanced thermal management and advanced camera capabilities suggests DJI is responding directly to these evolving requirements while maintaining the practical considerations that have made the Mavic series successful.
Découvrez plus de DroneXL.co
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
FAITES ENTENDRE VOTRE VOIX
Une proposition de loi menace votre capacité à utiliser des drones pour le plaisir, le travail et la sécurité. La Alliance pour la défense des drones Rejoignez-nous et dites à vos élus de protéger votre droit de voler.
Obtenez votre certificat Part 107
Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the Institut pilote. Nous avons aidé des milliers de personnes à devenir pilotes d'avion et de drones commerciaux. Nos cours sont conçus par des experts de l'industrie pour vous aider à passer les tests de la FAA et à réaliser vos rêves.

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please nous contacter first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the Alliance pour la défense des drones. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.
FTC : DroneXL.co est un associé d'Amazon et utilise des liens d'affiliation qui peuvent générer des revenus à partir d'achats qualifiés. Nous ne vendons pas, ne partageons pas, ne louons pas et ne spammons pas votre email.
They most definitely have not dropped Lidar in favour of weight, because in the UK an EU even the Mavic 3 pro was over the 900g limit for C1 class drones, and given the Mavic 4 is supposed to weigh 1045g as is, its already 146g overweight so Lidar isn’t going to make a single bit of difference in weight terms of saving, as in if it was added on top it might take the drone to 1050g
I cant see any reason why DJI would not put Lidar on board given that its the ultimate DJI flagship for consumers and budget prosumers, I mean the next step after this is the inspire 3.
If it is not on board then they have probably developed better fisheye lenses with possible better AI scene recognition or something?
I’m curious as to why lidar is not part of the design as well. Feels like typical DJI… Saving it for the next go. They had a couple of features and leave one on the table for the future to be sure that you’ll buy it.
As a YouTuber I’m not sure that I need this particular drone. Currently a pair of Mavic 3’s get it done for me with a pair of Mini 3 Pro’s for when sub 250 gram flights are in order.
I’m sure mavic 4 will be a great drone but things have really leveled off and I just don’t see a reason yet the part with my hard-earned money for something that probably won’t do much for me.
You are very right in my opinion. The last generation of DJI drones is more than good enough for most people. The Air 3, Air 3S, Mini 3 Pro, Mini 4 Pro, Mavic 3, you really cannot go wrong with any of these camera drones for social media, YouTube and a whole range of other applications.
What is a DJI Air 3Sm?
That is straight from the article or is that a typo?
That must have been a typo. We’LL fix it.
TY I wasn’t sure.
I currently reside in the United States, and for the past few months, I’ve found myself grounded, unable to fly either of the two drones I own as a recreational pilot. This situation stems largely from the pervasive fear-mongering by the media surrounding drone usage and the subsequent regulatory bans that have emerged. The thought of pursuing a Part 107 license fills me with apprehension, further complicating my desire to engage with this hobby.
Recently, I came across some concerning news: DJI, the leading drone manufacturer, has decided to remove the geofencing feature from its drones—an announcement that raises many questions for the future of their products. With the launch of the DJI Mavic 4 on the horizon, I’m puzzled about how this decision aligns with their market strategy. I’ve owned my Mavic 3 Pro for less than a year and my Mini 3 Pro for just under two years—both still feel quite new to me.
This brings to mind a comparison with Apple Inc.—will DJI adopt a similar approach by offering consumers the opportunity to trade in their drones for a discounted price to upgrade to the latest model? More importantly, does the Mavic 4 come equipped with the geofencing feature, or has that been removed as well? These questions fill me with uncertainty as I navigate the current drone landscape.