From Hobby to Courtroom: Dublin Man’s DJI Drone Misstep

In Ireland, a man charged with the illegal operation of a DJI drone in Dublin Airport‘s critical area now faces the prospect of a jury trial, according to court proceedings. Ainis Guzauskus, a 41-year-old father of two, had his original charge upgraded to intentionally disrupting the operation of an air navigation facility.
In a Dublin District Court appearance before Judge Treasa Kelly, Guzauskus, a resident of Ridgewood Close, Swords, Dublin, received his updated charge. The initial charge, filed in February, accused Guzauskus of triggering a false alarm by operating an unmanned aerial system (drone) within Dublin Airport’s critical zone.
The replaced charge implicates Guzauskus under section three of the Air Navigation and Transport Act 1975. The allegation states that on July 2, 2022, Guzauskus illegally and intentionally disrupted Dublin Airport’s operations by flying a “DJI Mavic Mini 2” drone.
The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) 伝えられるところによれば stated that if Guzauskus disputes the case, it would be heard before a judge and jury in a higher court. Garda Sean Murphy also indicated the DPP would allow the case to remain in the District Court if Guzauskus pleads guilty.
Defence solicitor Donal Quigley requested an adjournment to study Irish Aviation Authority regulations before deciding on a plea. Guzauskus’ bail conditions, carried over from the previous charge, underwent modification as a result of Quigley’s submission.
A previous restriction preventing Guzauskus from approaching within two kilometers of the airport without 警察 permission was lifted, considering his residence’s proximity to the airport.
Judge Kelly retained other bail conditions from February, including a prohibition on drone flying, a ban on applying for a new passport, and a requirement to stay contactable and not leave the country without court approval. The case will continue in July.
In a separate case, another man, Eric Brills, faces similar charges for operating a drone in Dublin Airport’s 300-meter critical area. He is due in court later this month to indicate his plea. It remains unlawful to operate drones within 5 km of the airport, and drones over a specific size must be registered with unique digital fingerprints for identification.
You can read more stories about drone incidents on DroneXL.co
Note: It is unclear if the drone in question was a DJI Mavic 2 or a DJI Mini 2 drone. All the reporting, we have come across refers to a non-exisiting “DJI Mavic Mini 2” drone.
DroneXL.coをもっと見る
購読すると最新の投稿がメールで送信されます。
声を届ける
提案されている法案は、楽しみ、仕事、安全のためにドローンを使用するあなたの能力を脅かす。その ドローン擁護同盟 私たちと一緒に、あなたの選挙で選ばれた議員に、空を飛ぶ権利を守るよう訴えましょう。
パート107証明書の取得
Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the パイロット・インスティテュート.私たちは、何千人もの人々が飛行機や商業ドローンパイロットになるのを助けてきました。私たちのコースは、FAAのテストに合格し、あなたの夢を達成するために、業界の専門家によって設計されています。

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please お問い合わせ first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the ドローン擁護同盟. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.
FTC:DroneXL.coはAmazonアソシエイトであり、対象となる購入から収入を得ることができるアフィリエイトリンクを使用しています。私たちは、あなたの電子メールを販売、共有、貸し出し、またはスパムはありません。