Drone Manufacturers Struggle with Remote ID Compliance Ahead of FAA Deadline

SkySafe's Research Reveals Drone Industry's Lack of Preparedness for Remote ID Implementation

In a recent study conducted by SkySafe, a leading drone tracking data and intelligence company, it was discovered that five out of seven drone manufacturers will not be compliant by the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) deadline on March 16, 2024. This lack of readiness raises concerns about airspace management, safety, and the enforcement of the Remote ID rule.

The FAA's Remote ID rule, initially set to take effect in September 2023, was extended to March 16, 2024, to give manufacturers and operators more time to prepare. The rule requires drones weighing over 250 grams to broadcast identifying and positional information while in flight. Drone operators who fail to comply by the deadline may face fines and the suspension or revocation of their pilot certificates.

READ MORE: FAA REMOTE ID FOR DRONES KICKS IN TOMORROW!

Remote ID is often compared to a digital license plate, providing a means for public safety and other authorized officials to identify the owner of a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS) if it is flying in an unsafe manner or in a restricted area. With over 1 million drones registered in the and nearly 3.5 million total drones currently in use, the ability to differentiate authorized drones from potential threats is crucial.

SkySafe's research team investigated the implementation of standard Remote ID drones across seven manufacturers: DJI, , Autel, , , EXO, and . The team found significant inconsistencies in implementing the FAA-required specifications outlined in ASTM F3411 – 22a, “Standard Specification for Remote ID and Tracking.”

Skydio is Remote ID Ready

Only Skydio, an American drone company, has properly implemented standard Remote ID technology in its current fleet models. Skydio's implementation earned a “Fully Ready” grade due to its accurate and robust implementation, which includes the use of compliant serial numbers and prohibiting users from disabling Remote ID broadcasts in its mobile app.

Other manufacturers, however, fell short. DJI received a “Minor Issues” grade, while Parrot received a “Needs Improvement” grade. Autel was given a “Major Flaws” grade, and SwellPro, EXO, and Yuneec received “Not Compliant” grades.

The lack of Remote ID readiness among drone manufacturers raises questions about accountability and culpability. Who is at fault if a pilot is found to be operating a standard Remote ID drone that doesn't follow the required specifications? Who will hold manufacturers responsible for implementations that do not comply with the ASTM standard for Remote ID?

As the March 16 deadline approaches, SkySafe's research highlights the need for accountability in adhering to standards. SkySafe plans to share Remote ID data with the FAA to help monitor the program beyond the deadline. Drone manufacturers must revisit their efforts around Remote ID implementation to ensure pilots can operate their drones safely and compliantly.

In conclusion, the must embrace a culture of responsiveness around industry standards to safeguard both innovation and safety in the ever-evolving landscape of sUAS technology.


DroneXLをもっと見る

購読すると最新の投稿がメールで送信されます。

声を届ける

提案されている法案は、楽しみ、仕事、安全のためにドローンを使用するあなたの能力を脅かす。その ドローン擁護同盟 私たちと一緒に、あなたの選挙で選ばれた議員に、空を飛ぶ権利を守るよう訴えましょう。

ドローン擁護同盟
今すぐ行動を起こす
Google Newsでフォローしてください!

パート107証明書の取得

テストに合格して、空へ飛び立とう。 パイロット・インスティテュート.私たちは、何千人もの人々が飛行機や商業ドローンパイロットになるのを助けてきました。私たちのコースは、FAAのテストに合格し、あなたの夢を達成するために、業界の専門家によって設計されています。

パイロット・インスティチュート・ドローネクスル

著作権©DroneXL.co 2024。無断複写・転載を禁じます。本ウェブサイト上のコンテンツ、画像、知的財産は著作権法により保護されています。DroneXL.coの書面による事前の許可なく、複製または配布することは固く禁じられています。許可およびお問い合わせ先 お問い合わせ 第一に

FTC:DroneXL.coはAmazonアソシエイトであり、対象となる購入から収入を得ることができるアフィリエイトリンクを使用しています。私たちは、あなたの電子メールを販売、共有、貸し出し、またはスパムはありません。

ヘイ・ケステルー
ヘイ・ケステルー

の編集長兼創設者である。 DroneXL.coドローン関連のニュース、DJIの噂、ドローンのレビューを執筆している。 EVXL.co電気自動車に関連するすべてのニュースを提供。の共同司会者でもある。 PiXLドローンショー をYouTubeやその他のポッドキャスト・プラットフォームで配信している。ヘイへの連絡先: haye @ dronexl.co または hayekesteloo.

記事本文: 3731

2件のコメント

  1. How interesting: a company (SkySafe) with Andreessen Horowitz as the lead investor has issued a report absolutely gushing with positive remarks about how only one company (Skydio) is fully compliant, and also happens Andreesen Horowitz as a lead investor…

    I’m sure that is a complete coincidence.

    • I was wondering the same thing. Too much of a coincidence, right? Seems like Skydio is fighting DJI in new and interesting ways.

返信を残す

このサイトはスパムを低減するために Akismet を使っています。コメントデータの処理方法の詳細はこちらをご覧ください

jaJapanese