Georgia Lawmakers Push Drone Regulations, Targeting Chinese Manufacturers and Public Safety

lawmakers are advancing comprehensive drone regulations through multiple bills, with bipartisan support focusing on national security and public safety concerns, according to state legislative documents. The measures would restrict both drone operations and procurement sources for state agencies, reports The Atlanta Journal Constitution.

House Bill 205, which received unanimous committee approval, would require the Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency to create an approved drone list for state and local government purchases. These drones must meet Federal Aviation Administration and U.S. standards, with agencies given a three-year compliance window.

“There is no price tag on national security in our country,” said State Rep. David Clark, R-Buford, the bill’s primary author, citing concerns about risks from leading drone manufacturers DJI and Autel, which have ties to the Chinese government.

A companion measure, Senate Bill 64, specifically targets drones under 55 pounds manufactured or assembled in または .

State Sen. Ed Setzler, R-Acworth, who chairs the Science and Technology Committee, emphasized the strategic importance: “As UAVs become more and more systemically important to our nation’s entire stream of commerce, we need to limit the ability of malevolent actors such as China and Russia from having an outsized influence on our economy and collecting rich aerial data on our citizens.”

The economic impact could be significant. Georgia Geospatial Association drone chair Brody Baer noted that American-made alternatives typically cost substantially more than Chinese-manufactured drones, which currently dominate the commercial market.

The timing coincides with drone delivery expansion plans in Atlanta. Wing, a drone delivery company partnered with and DoorDash, recently demonstrated its 11-pound delivery drones to state legislators. The company positions its service as an efficient alternative to traditional delivery methods.

Additional measures include House Bill 58, which would prohibit drone flights within 400 feet of large ticketed events, and House Bill 156, designating the as the authority over “vertiports” – specialized drone takeoff and landing facilities.

The legislative push follows recent drone activity concerns in , though the clarified last month that these flights were FAA-authorized and included legitimate commercial, research, and hobbyist operations.


DroneXL.coをもっと見る

購読すると最新の投稿がメールで送信されます。

声を届ける

提案されている法案は、楽しみ、仕事、安全のためにドローンを使用するあなたの能力を脅かす。その ドローン擁護同盟 私たちと一緒に、あなたの選挙で選ばれた議員に、空を飛ぶ権利を守るよう訴えましょう。

ドローン擁護同盟
今すぐ行動を起こす
Google Newsでフォローしてください!

パート107証明書の取得

Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the パイロット・インスティテュート.私たちは、何千人もの人々が飛行機や商業ドローンパイロットになるのを助けてきました。私たちのコースは、FAAのテストに合格し、あなたの夢を達成するために、業界の専門家によって設計されています。

パイロット・インスティチュート・ドローネクスル

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please お問い合わせ first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the ドローン擁護同盟. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC:DroneXL.coはAmazonアソシエイトであり、対象となる購入から収入を得ることができるアフィリエイトリンクを使用しています。私たちは、あなたの電子メールを販売、共有、貸し出し、またはスパムはありません。

ヘイ・ケステルー
ヘイ・ケステルー

Haye Kesteloo is a leading drone industry expert and Editor in Chief of DroneXL.co そして EVXL.co, where he covers drone technology, industry developments, and electric mobility trends. With over nine years of specialized coverage in unmanned aerial systems, his insights have been featured in The New York Times, The Financial Times, and cited by The Brookings Institute, Foreign Policy, Politico and others.

Before founding DroneXL.co, Kesteloo built his expertise at DroneDJ. He currently co-hosts the PiXLドローンショー on YouTube and podcast platforms, sharing industry insights with a global audience. His reporting has influenced policy discussions and been referenced in federal documents, establishing him as an authoritative voice in drone technology and regulation. He can be reached at haye @ dronexl.co or hayekesteloo.

記事本文: 4708

1件のコメント

  1. If security is on their mind then it kinda feels like your too late. What’s that too say in American drones are more expensive as the article states. They also didn’t say that it’s because your paying for a better product. Which is typically the reason for paying more for a product. I’m pretty sure every citizen or business in China has some connection with its government in some way. How many people and businesses in China work hard to better their situation and hopefully break away from government control. I heard it ain’t peaches like it is here boys. If I vote does that mean I have a connection to this government too? What if I work as a volunteer at a polling place or with a political party during an election year? At the speed of government with security issues it’s a good thing I can still bare arms. This is unfortunately a land of consumers. We want we buy we eat more than or fill. We don’t create or lead major industries anymore. We’re to lazy or just lazy enough to know China will make it cheaper and good for them in at least creating a fine product that is probably the best in the world. They could easily sell us inferior products or keep us 1 step behind them as. There people reserve the best of the best and we get seconds. Give recreational drone pilots and DIYers more flexibility and I promise they will close the technology gap quicker and create a product we all want to use. Something somewhere has to change my people. I’m first to admit it.

コメントを残す

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

jaJapanese