US House Bans New DJI Drones: A Closer Look

The US House of Representatives has just approved the (H.R. 2864), a bill aimed at banning the operation of new drones from Chinese manufacturer DJI in the . This move is part of a broader series of measures targeting that lawmakers are reviewing this week.

The Bill and Its Impact

The bill, introduced by Representative Elise Stefanik, requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to include DJI’s telecommunications and video surveillance equipment on a list of communications equipment posing an unacceptable risk to US national security.

If passed by the Senate and signed into law, the bill would prevent future DJI drones from operating on US communications infrastructure. However, it would not affect DJI drones already in use within the country.

“With this action, Congress will ensure that future versions of DJI drones cannot be imported, marketed, or sold in the United States,” said Representative Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee.

DJI, which sells more than half of all drones in the United States, opposes the bill.

The Chinese drone maker argues that the legislation “restricts the ability of U.S. drone operators to buy and use the right equipment for their work, solely on the basis of the equipment’s country of origin,” according to Reuters.

DJI’s Dominance and Allegations

DJI’s dominance in the US drone market is undeniable. The company’s drones are widely used in various sectors, including photography, agriculture, , and law enforcement. However, this dominance has also raised concerns among US lawmakers.

“Over the last seven years, the US government has publicly confirmed time and time again that DJI drones are being used to collect information on US critical infrastructure and pose significant risks to US national security,” Stefanik said in her speech.

Moreover, DJI is on the US list of Chinese military companies because it directly advances the modernization efforts of the People’s Liberation Army. Not only does DJI improve the equipment of the US’s strategic adversary, but it also actively aids the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in carrying out alleged genocidal crimes against ethnic minorities, Stefanik argued in her speech.

READ MORE: BLUE SUAS PROBLEMS AND FLORIDA DMS SECRETARY ACCUSED OF PIMPING FOR SKYDIO

Lawmakers Urge Action On Chinese Agriculture Drones
Skies darken over DJI’s prospects in the United States.

DJI’s Response

DJI has consistently denied these allegations, asserting that the company does not share sensitive data with any government.

In a statement, DJI said, “There is no evidence that DJI systems have ever transmitted sensitive user data to DJI, the Chinese government, or any other unauthorized party.”

The company argues that the bill limits US drone operators’ ability to choose the best equipment for their needs, potentially impacting public safety operations that rely on DJI drones. For instance, DJI drones have been used in search and rescue missions, helping to save lives.

The Broader Context

This legislation is part of a larger trend of increasing congressional attention to China-related issues. The number of China-related bills introduced in Congress has increased significantly since 2018. Other measures being considered include restrictions on Chinese batteries and tightening of US electric vehicle tax credits to exclude Chinese content.

Another bill approved this week seeks to deter China from invading or imposing a blockade of Taiwan. This bill includes measures to publish the assets of top Chinese leaders and cut them and their family members off from the US financial system if Beijing takes action against Taiwan.

The Future of the Bill

While this legislation has passed the House, its future remains uncertain. The bill still requires approval from the US Senate to become law. With the 2024 elections approaching, it’s unclear whether this or other proposed measures targeting China will become law this year.

“It is past time we end Communist China’s role as the world’s drone factory,” Stefanik said. “My legislation, the Countering CCP Drones Act, will place DJI on the FCC’s Covered List, which will prohibit new models of DJI drones from operating in America.”

Implications for the Drone Industry

The potential ban on DJI drones could have significant implications for the in the US. Many businesses and government agencies rely on DJI drones for their operations. If the ban goes into effect, these entities may need to look for alternative drone providers.

READ MORE: DRONE INDUSTRY’S OUTRAGE OVER STEFANIK’S ANTI-CHINA LEGISLATION

This could open up opportunities for other drone manufacturers, including US-based companies. However, it remains to be seen whether these companies can fill the gap left by DJI, which has a strong reputation for producing high-quality, affordable drones.

Drone Industry'S Outrage Over Stefanik'S Anti-China Legislation
Drone Industry’s Outrage Over Stefanik’s Anti-China Legislation

DroneXL’s Take

The potential ban on DJI drones is a complex issue with far-reaching implications. As we’ve reported previously, public safety experts have warned of significant consequences if this ban goes into effect. The lack of readily available alternatives could severely impact and other critical users of .

Moreover, as discussed in our recent article, many of the features that lawmakers cite as security risks were initially implemented in response to pressure and regulations. This irony underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to addressing security concerns.

We believe that fostering a competitive and innovative domestic drone industry is essential, but this should be done through proactive investment and support for U.S. , rather than reactive bans that could do more harm than good in the short term. Any policy decisions should be based on comprehensive research and expert testimony from a wide range of stakeholders to ensure that regulations enhance security without stifling innovation or hampering valuable work being done with drone technology across the United States.

What are your thoughts on this article? Leave your comments below. Let’s discuss the potential impact of this bill on the drone industry and the broader US-China relations.


DroneXL.co에서 더 알아보기

구독을 신청하면 최신 게시물을 이메일로 받아볼 수 있습니다.

여러분의 목소리를 들려주세요

제안된 법안은 재미, 업무, 안전을 위해 드론을 사용할 수 있는 능력을 위협합니다. The 드론 옹호 연합 는 이러한 중요한 정책 논의에서 여러분의 목소리가 반영될 수 있도록 노력하고 있습니다. 저희와 함께 여러분의 선출직 공직자들에게 여러분의 비행권을 보호해 달라고 말씀해 주세요.

드론 옹호 연합
지금 조치 취하기
Google 뉴스에서 팔로우하세요!

Part 107 인증서 받기

시험을 통과하고 하늘을 날아보세요. 파일럿 연구소. 수천 명의 사람들이 비행기 및 상업용 드론 조종사가 될 수 있도록 도와주었습니다. 저희 과정은 업계 전문가들이 FAA 시험에 합격하고 꿈을 이룰 수 있도록 설계했습니다.

파일럿 인스티튜트 드론넥슬

저작권 © DroneXL.co 2024. 모든 권리 보유. 이 웹사이트의 콘텐츠, 이미지 및 지적 재산은 저작권법의 보호를 받습니다. DroneXL.co의 사전 서면 허가 없이 자료를 복제하거나 배포하는 것은 엄격히 금지됩니다. 허가 및 문의 사항은 다음 연락처로 문의하시기 바랍니다. 문의하기 first. Also, be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC: DroneXL.co는 아마존 제휴사이며 적격 구매를 통해 수익을 창출할 수 있는 제휴사 링크를 사용합니다. 당사는 사용자의 이메일을 판매, 공유, 대여 또는 스팸으로 전송하지 않습니다.

헤이 케스텔루
헤이 케스텔루

헤이 케스텔루는 편집장 겸 창립자입니다. DroneXL.co에서 드론 관련 모든 뉴스와 DJI 루머를 다루고 드론 리뷰를 작성하고 있습니다. EVXL.co를 통해 전기차와 관련된 모든 소식을 전하고 있습니다. 그는 또한 PiXL 드론 쇼 유튜브 및 기타 팟캐스트 플랫폼에서 확인할 수 있습니다. Haye는 haye @ dronexl.co 또는 헤이케스텔루.

기사: 4117

2 Comments

댓글 남기기

이 사이트는 스팸을 줄이는 아키스밋을 사용합니다. 댓글이 어떻게 처리되는지 알아보십시오.

ko_KRKorean