Certain foreign-made drones cannot be bought with DOJ grant funds

On Thursday, the Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) announced the issuance of new guidance that bans the use of agency grants to purchase foreign-made drones and other unmanned aerial systems from foreign groups deemed threats.

Updated with response from DJI.

Certain foreign-made drones cannot be bought with DOJ grant funds

No funds awarded or made available by OJP, through a contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or otherwise, to a state, local, tribal, or territorial government (including via subcontract or subaward, at any tier) may be used to purchase, use, or operate any unmanned aircraft system that is manufactured or assembled by a covered foreign entity.

And the DOJ defines a covered foreign entity as follows:

“Covered foreign entity” means any entity that is determined or designated, within the Department of Justice, to be subject to or vulnerable to extrajudicial direction from a foreign government.

While issued on Monday, the guidance was only made public on Thursday. The new DOJ policy aims to increase the security of drones by requiring that OJP loan applicants can mitigate any ‘cybersecurity and privacy risks posed by these systems and that the applicant has a plan to address any civil liberties-related complaints that could arise’, according to The Hill.

On Thursday, The Justice Department'S Office Of Justice Programs (Ojp) Announced The Issuance Of New Guidance That Bans The Use Of Agency Grants To Purchase Drones And Other Unmanned Aerial Systems From Foreign Groups Deemed Threats. Certain Foreign-Made Drones Cannot Be Bought With Doj Grant Funds No Funds Awarded Or Made Available By Ojp, Through A Contract, Grant, Cooperative Agreement, Or Otherwise, To A State, Local, Tribal, Or Territorial Government (Including Via Subcontract Or Subaward, At Any Tier) May Be Used To Purchase, Use, Or Operate Any Unmanned Aircraft System That Is Manufactured Or Assembled By A Covered Foreign Entity. And The Doj Defines A Covered Foreign Entity As Follows: “Covered Foreign Entity&Quot; Means Any Entity That Is Determined Or Designated, Within The Department Of Justice, To Be Subject To Or Vulnerable To Extrajudicial Direction From A Foreign Government. While Issued On Monday, The Guidance Was Only Made Public On Thursday. The New Doj Policy Aims To Increase The Security Of Drones By Requiring That Ojp Loan Applicants Can Mitigate Any ‘Cybersecurity And Privacy Risks Posed By These Systems And That The Applicant Has A Plan To Address Any Civil Liberties-Related Complaints That Could Arise', According To The Hill. The New Doj Policy Does Not Single Out Any Specific Country, But It Is Not Hard To Imagine That The Guidance Applies To Chinese-Made Drones. The Policy Refers To Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Uas) That Are “Manufactured Or Assembled By A Covered Foreign Entity.” It Does Not Specifically Mention Drones That Are Made In The United States, But That Still Contain Chinese-Made Parts As Do All The So-Called ‘Blue Suas' Do. The House-Passed 2021 National Defense Authorization Act Contains A Provision That Would Ban The Federal Government From Purchasing Certain Foreign-Made Drones, Including Uas From China, Because Of National Security Concerns. Over The Last Few Years, The World'S Largest And Also Chinese Drone Maker, Dji Has Come Under Increased Scrutiny From U.s. Lawmakers And Federal Government Agencies. Dji Has Always Maintained That They Do Not Share Any Information With The Chinese Government, And That Drone Users Can Decide If They Want To Share Any Information From Their Uas With Dji. The Company Went As Far As To Create A Local Data Mode On Some Of Its Drones To Prevent Any Information From Being Shared Online. Dji Developed In Partnership With The U.s. Department Of The Interior A Special ‘Government Edition' For Select Dji Drones That Provides Even More Data Security. “We Take Seriously Concerns About The Use Of Foreign-Made Uas And The Potential For Related Data Compromise,” Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen Said In A Statement Thursday, According To The Hill. “It Is Paramount That Funding Recipients Take Effective Measures To Safeguard Sensitive Information And The Public'S Privacy And Civil Liberties While Operating These Systems In A Safe And Secure Manner.” The New Policy From The Justice Department Was Released The Same Week Secretary Of The Interior David Bernhardt Issued Separate Guidance Allowing The Department To Buy ‘American-Made, But Still Containing Chinese-Made Parts' Drones, Or So-Called Blue Suas, As Defined By An Initiative Of The Department Of Defense. Earlier This Year, The U.s. Department Of The Interior Temporarily Grounded Its Entire Fleet Of 810 3Dr Solo And Dji Drones From Use In Non-Emergency Operations Because Of Cybersecurity Concerns. “While Drones Are Important To Critical Interior Missions, The Department Needed To Ensure The Technology Used For These Operations Is Such That It Would Not Compromise Our National Security Interests,” Interior Department Press Secretary Ben Goldey Wrote In An Email To Reporters This Week. The Data Security Concerns Related To Chinese-Made Drones Are Part Of A Larger Effort By The Current Administration Against China And Chinese Companies. Previously, Huawei And Tiktok Have Come Under Intense Scrutiny. Dji Has Pushed Back Against The Allegations And Also Responded To The New Guidance From The Department Of The Interior And Pointed Out That The Blue Suas Are Three To Five Times More Expensive Than Comparable Dji Uas. “The New Doi Guidance Finally Acknowledges That The Grounding Of Its Drone Fleet Was Never About National Security, But Rather Thinly-Veiled Economic Protectionism. Five Manufacturers Were Just Handed An Unfair Advantage In The Marketplace, As They Can Build Their Drones With Chinese Parts While Other Companies Cannot. The Blue Drone Companies Also Charge Three To Five Times More Than A Comparable Dji Platform, Meaning U.s. Taxpayers Are Footing The Bill For Expensive Military-Grade Drone Technology From Defense Contractors For Non-Military Activity Such As Prescribed Burns, Wildlife Conservation And Geological Surveying.” In September, The Alliance For Drone Innovation, Which Also Represents Dji Sent A Letter To The Leaders Of The House And Senate Armed Services Committees Pointing Out That Banning Federal Use Of Drones From Certain Companies Could Be “Detrimental To The U.s. Drone Industry.” “Manufacturing A Drone Simply Cannot Be Done Today Without Parts And Knowledge From All Over The World, And A Country-Based Ban Would Hurt The Americans Who Build Drones As Well As The Americans Who Use Them For Recreation, Business, Conservation, And Even Saving Lives,” The Alliance Wrote. - Only Approved Drones, So-Called Blue Suas Are Exempt From The Pmb Approval And Reporting Procedures, Opening The Door For The Department Of The Interior To Rebuild Its Drone Fleet And Start Using It Again For Non-Emergency Missions.

Certain Foreign-Made Drones Cannot Be Bought With Doj Grant Funds 1

Does foreign-made drones really mean DJI drones?

The new DOJ policy does not single out any specific country, but it is not hard to imagine that the guidance applies to Chinese-made drones.

The policy refers to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that are “manufactured or assembled by a covered foreign entity.” It does not specifically mention drones that are made in the , but that still contain Chinese-made parts as do all the so-called ‘蓝色 sUAS‘ do.

The House-passed 2021 National Defense Authorization Act contains a provision that would ban the federal government from purchasing certain foreign-made drones, including UAS from , because of national security concerns.

Over the last few years, the world’s largest and also Chinese drone maker, DJI has come under increased scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and federal government agencies. DJI has always maintained that they do not share any information with the Chinese government, and that drone users can decide if they want to share any information from their UAS with DJI. The company went as far as to create a Local Data Mode on some of its drones to prevent any information from being shared online. DJI developed in partnership with the U.S. Department of the Interior a special ‘Government Edition’ for select DJI drones that provides even more data security.

“We take seriously concerns about the use of foreign-made UAS and the potential for related data compromise,” Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen said in a statement Thursday, according to The Hill. “It is paramount that funding recipients take effective measures to safeguard sensitive information and the public’s privacy and civil liberties while operating these systems in a safe and secure manner.”

The new policy from the Justice Department was released the same week Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt issued separate guidance allowing the department to buy ‘American-made, but still containing Chinese-made parts’ drones, or so-called 蓝色 sUAS, as defined by an initiative of the Department of Defense.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of the Interior temporarily grounded its entire fleet of 810 3DR Solo unmanned aircraft and various DJI drones from use in non-emergency operations because of cybersecurity concerns.

“While drones are important to critical Interior missions, the Department needed to ensure the technology used for these operations is such that it would not compromise our national security interests,” Interior Department press secretary Ben Goldey wrote in an email to reporters this week.

"(《世界人权宣言》) concerns related to Chinese-made drones are part of a larger effort by the current administration against China and Chinese companies. Previously, Huawei and TikTok have come under intense scrutiny.

Certain Foreign-Made Drones Cannot Be Bought With Doj Grant Funds 2

Foreign-Made Drone

An example of a foreign-made drone that helped save a duck hunter’s life earlier this week.

DJI has pushed back against the allegations and also responded to the new guidance from the Department of the Interior and pointed out that the are three to five times more expensive than comparable DJI UAS.

“The new DOI guidance finally acknowledges that the grounding of its drone fleet was never about national security, but rather thinly-veiled economic protectionism. Five manufacturers were just handed an unfair advantage in the marketplace, as they can build their drones with Chinese parts while other companies cannot. The Blue also charge three to five times more than a comparable DJI platform, meaning U.S. taxpayers are footing the bill for expensive military-grade from defense contractors for non-military activity such as prescribed burns, wildlife conservation and geological surveying.”

In September, the , which also represents DJI sent a letter to the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services committees pointing out that banning federal use of drones from certain companies could be “detrimental to the U.S. drone industry.”

“Manufacturing a drone simply cannot be done today without parts and knowledge from all over the world, and a country-based ban would hurt the Americans who build drones as well as the Americans who use them for recreation, business, conservation, and even saving lives,” the alliance wrote.

Official response from DJI on DOJ policy on foreign-made drones

“This Justice Department order will deprive hundreds of public safety agencies of a lifesaving tool and put our communities’ emergency workers in harm’s way, much like the Interior Department’s drone policies have made it riskier to fight wildfires. There are serious consequences to these protectionist policies that achieve no security benefit, as shown by the many independent and federal agency validations confirming that DJI products are safe and secure for government operations.”

For further information please see these links:

Flying drones as a career?

If you want to turn your hobby into your career, practice how to fly your drone safely, and learn what it takes to get your , be sure to check out the excellent training modules from The Drone U.

Droneu 营销横幅广告 1

保持联系!

If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews, follow us on 推特, 在 Facebook 上, YouTube, Instagram, or…

订阅我们的每日无人机新闻电子邮件*。


 

提交提示 如果您想与我们分享信息或技巧,请随时提交 这里支持 DroneXL.co: 您可以在下次购买无人机时使用这些链接来支持 DroneXL.co: Adorama, 亚马逊, B&H, 百思买, 易趣网, 大疆创新, 鹦鹉Yuneec.我们会在您不支付额外费用的情况下收取少量佣金。感谢您帮助 DroneXL 发展! 联邦贸易委员会: DroneXL.co 使用可产生收入的联盟链接。


* 我们绝不出售、共享、出租或发送垃圾邮件。我们的电子邮件在工作日下午 5:30 左右发出。


了解 DroneXL 的更多信息

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

发出你的声音

拟议的立法威胁到您使用无人机娱乐、工作和安全的能力。无人机 无人机宣传联盟 加入我们,告诉您的民选官员保护您的飞行权利。

无人机宣传联盟
立即行动
在谷歌新闻上关注我们!

获取第 107 部分证书

通过测试,带着 试点研究所.我们已帮助数千人成为飞机和商用无人机飞行员。我们的课程由行业专家设计,帮助您通过 FAA 考试,实现梦想。

试验研究所

版权所有 © DroneXL.co 2024。保留所有权利。本网站的内容、图像和知识产权受版权法保护。未经 DroneXL.co 事先书面许可,严禁复制或传播任何资料。有关许可和咨询,请 联系我们 首先

美国联邦贸易委员会:DroneXL.co 是亚马逊联营公司,使用联营链接可从符合条件的购买中获得收入。我们不会出售、分享、出租或向您发送垃圾邮件。

Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo 是以下网站的创始人和主编 DroneXL.co在这里,他报道所有与无人机相关的新闻、大疆创新公司的传言并撰写无人机评论,以及 EVXL.co的所有与电动汽车有关的新闻。他还是 PiXL 无人机表演 YouTube 和其他播客平台。您可以通过以下方式联系 Haye:haye @ dronexl.co 或 @hayekesteloo.

文章: 3976

发表评论

此站点使用Akismet来减少垃圾评论。了解我们如何处理您的评论数据

zh_CNChinese