Domestic drones can be hacked, and foreign drones can be secure

An interesting article was posted on The Hill yesterday that points out that domestic drones (蓝色 sUAS) can be hacked, and foreign drones, such as the ones from DJI, can be secure.

Domestic drones can be hacked, and foreign drones can be secure

In an opinion piece on The Hill, Daniel Castro, vice president at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) and director of ITIF’s Center for Data Innovation, and Ashley Johnson who is a research analyst at ITIF argue that drone localization policies will backfire. In the article, they state that domestic drones can be hacked, and foreign drones can be secure. The country of origin has very little to do with data security.

“The U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) revised its drone purchasing policy in October, prohibiting the use of OJP funds to purchase drones manufactured by a “covered foreign entity” — which it defines as any entity that is “subject or vulnerable to extrajudicial direction from a foreign government.”

As a result, the U.S. Department of the Interior grounded its fleet of 810 drones and the Department of Defense created a special group of trusted, mostly American drone manufacturers called the 蓝色 sUAS, which includes Altavian, 鹦鹉 (French), Skydio, 茶色和 Vantage Robotics. Blue sUAS are exempt from approval and reporting requirements, said the Interior Department in an October memo. Never mind that these drones are significantly more expensive than alternative drones from let’s say, DJI. The 司法部 also restricted which drones could be bought with grant money.

“These [localization] policies restricting foreign-made drones serve no real purpose because the security of drones doesn’t depend on where they are made.”

“Domestic drones can be hacked, and foreign drones can be secure.”

The authors state that the risk of drones secretly sending data to 中国 is minimal for many reasons as in most cases domestic drones and foreign ones are not connected to the internet when flown and any data transfer could be easily monitored to detect any nefarious activity.

“Broad restrictions like those the departments of Justice and Interior are implementing limit the government’s options and could lead to reduced adoption of 无人机技术. They also create a false sense of security, where the government and the public assume domestically manufactured drones are secure, even though this may not always be the case.”

The localization policies employed by the 美国政府 to restrict which drones can be purchased with federal funds does not increase Data Security and provides a poor approach that is likely to be followed in other countries, such as Japan.

You can read the entire article 这里.

保持联系！

If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews follow us on 推特, 在 Facebook 上, YouTube, Instagram, or…

订阅我们的每日无人机新闻电子邮件*。

提交提示 如果您想与我们分享信息或技巧，请随时提交 这里. 支持 DroneXL.co： 您可以在下次购买无人机时使用这些链接来支持 DroneXL.co： Adorama, 亚马逊, B&H, 百思买, 易趣网, 大疆创新, 鹦鹉和 Yuneec.我们会在您不支付额外费用的情况下收取少量佣金。感谢您帮助 DroneXL 发展！ 联邦贸易委员会： DroneXL.co 使用可产生收入的联盟链接。


* 我们绝不出售、共享、出租或发送垃圾邮件。我们的电子邮件在工作日下午 5:30 左右发出。