DJI’s response to being placed on economic blacklist

Last Friday, DJI was placed on the economic blacklist, officially known as the ‘Entity List’, by the U.S. . DJI had already issued a short response on the same day, but just now they added a slightly more detailed reply on Twitter.

DJI’s response to being placed on the economic blacklist

DJI’s placement on the economic blacklist means that U.S.-based companies that want to export hardware or software to DJI will need to obtain a special license, which may not be easy to obtain. DJI’s addition to this list was made effective at 11:15 am on Friday.

It seems that this measure by the will not have an immediate impact on the availability of the popular DJI drones in the stores in the U.S. It is yet unclear if this will change in the future. In the past, certain DJI products did contain components from U.S.-based companies. Examples are the thermal cameras from , the Ambarella processor that is found in a number of DJI drones, an Intel chip in the discontinued drone. And, there might well be more components inside DJI drones that we are not aware of. However, there is a good chance that DJI will quite easily be able to make drones that do not contain any hardware parts from U.S.-based companies. For instance, in the latest , the thermal camera is not from FLIR but seems to be an in-house developed camera from DJI. As far as software is concerned, it is unclear how DJI will be impacted here. Can the company keep using Google’s Android system for the ? Will the and others still be downloadable on Apple’s Appstore and Google’s Playstore?

But, we’re getting off track here. Last Friday, 大疆创新 quickly stated that:

“DJI is disappointed in the U.S. Department of Commerce’s decision. Customers in America can continue to buy and use DJI products normally. DJI remains committed to developing the industry’s most innovative products that define our company and benefit the world.”

And today, the company added the following on Twitter:

“DJI has done nothing to justify being placed on the Entity List. We have always focused on building products that save lives and benefit society. DJI and its employees remain committed to providing our customers with the industry’s most innovative technology. We are evaluating options to ensure our customers, partners, and suppliers are treated fairly.”

DJI and other companies were added to the list because of “wide-scale human rights abuses within through abusive genetic collection and analysis or high-technology surveillance,” according to the U.S. Commerce Department reported Reuters. Reference has been made to a passage from Bloomberg that indicates that DJI supplied drones as part of a deal for “strategic cooperation” to the public security bureau of Xinjiang in China. This information was available in a statement from DJI on the company website it has since been removed.

The Part 107 And Skydio 2 Giveaway

保持联系!

If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews follow us on 推特, 在 Facebook 上, YouTube, Instagram, or…

订阅我们的每日无人机新闻电子邮件*。


 

提交提示 如果您想与我们分享信息或技巧,请随时提交 这里支持 DroneXL.co: 您可以在下次购买无人机时使用这些链接来支持 DroneXL.co: Adorama, 亚马逊, B&H, 百思买, 易趣网, 大疆创新, 鹦鹉Yuneec.我们会在您不支付额外费用的情况下收取少量佣金。感谢您帮助 DroneXL 发展! 联邦贸易委员会: DroneXL.co 使用可产生收入的联盟链接。


* 我们绝不出售、共享、出租或发送垃圾邮件。我们的电子邮件在工作日下午 5:30 左右发出。


了解 DroneXL.co 的更多信息

订阅后即可通过电子邮件收到最新文章。

发出你的声音

拟议的立法威胁到您使用无人机娱乐、工作和安全的能力。无人机 无人机宣传联盟 加入我们,告诉您的民选官员保护您的飞行权利。

无人机宣传联盟
立即行动
在谷歌新闻上关注我们!

获取第 107 部分证书

Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the 试点研究所.我们已帮助数千人成为飞机和商用无人机飞行员。我们的课程由行业专家设计,帮助您通过 FAA 考试,实现梦想。

试验研究所

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please 联系我们 first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the 无人机宣传联盟. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

美国联邦贸易委员会:DroneXL.co 是亚马逊联营公司,使用联营链接可从符合条件的购买中获得收入。我们不会出售、分享、出租或向您发送垃圾邮件。

Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo is a leading drone industry expert and Editor in Chief of DroneXL.coEVXL.co, where he covers drone technology, industry developments, and electric mobility trends. With over nine years of specialized coverage in unmanned aerial systems, his insights have been featured in The New York Times, The Financial Times, and cited by The Brookings Institute, Foreign Policy, Politico and others.

Before founding DroneXL.co, Kesteloo built his expertise at DroneDJ. He currently co-hosts the PiXL 无人机表演 on YouTube and podcast platforms, sharing industry insights with a global audience. His reporting has influenced policy discussions and been referenced in federal documents, establishing him as an authoritative voice in drone technology and regulation. He can be reached at haye @ dronexl.co or @hayekesteloo.

文章: 4857

一条评论

  1. This is what happens when the government picks the winners and losers in what should be a free market. The incompetent and least innovative need not compete because the government has chosen them to win. The government sticks up artificial barriers to hold back what the market demands. We pay higher prices, get less innovation and nobody can enter the market because regulations cannot be overcome by the little guy. The result is we have a stagnated market and have to rely on production nightmares like the Skydio 2 (maybe you will get it in about a year if you reserve one now) scenario. DJI is the market leader in consumer drones. They have met or exceeded every demand. I guess you don’t want a company that makes products like that. As for the excuses about human rights abuses. Human rights abuse is very real and I find it amusing that banning DJI is going to actually fix it? What about the other 18 billion products…oh yeah, guess you forgot about those. Hypocracy and politics anyone?

发表评论

这个站点使用 Akismet 来减少垃圾评论。了解你的评论数据如何被处理

zh_CNChinese