We have three stories for you this week: the loses a major player, a bill that would allow drones to be shut down, and lastly, the leaks.

YouTube #!trpst#trp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=154#!trpen#video#!trpst#/trp-gettext#!trpen#

Industry Pioneer and Public Safety Visionary Passes Away

A sad first story: industry pioneer and public safety visionary Romeo Durscher has sadly passed away this week. Romeo was a pioneer of drones for public safety with the mantra “.” He worked for DJI as their Director of Public Safety Integration, where he led and assisted departments in getting started with drones. In 2018, the Camp Fire in destroyed an entire town. Romeo led 15 drone teams to create high-definition maps of over 177,000 acres in the days that followed the incident. He said, “After Santa Rosa, I thought I’d seen it all; then came Paradise. It’s beyond what one could imagine.” This was just one of the many ways Romeo helped cultivate drones in the public safety world.

Romeo then moved on from DJI to , where he pushed to ensure that public safety could use the best tools possible for their mission. Earlier this year, Romeo was given the Law Enforcement Drone Association’s Lifetime Achievement Award. He was also named one of the 25 most influential people in the drone industry and received the Golden Medal from the Estonian Chamber of Commerce. Haye from DroneXL.co put it best:

“Romeo Durscher’s passing leaves a big void, but his vision soars on. The drone industry stands at a crossroads, poised for growth yet challenged by regulation and ethics. Romeo showed us the way—technology must serve a purpose, not profit alone.”

Texas Bill Proposes Drone Shot Downs Over Private Property

Next up, a Texas bill would allow drones to be shot down if they’re flown over private property. There are several issues with this bill, as you can imagine, starting with 18 USC 32. This law protects civil aircraft both in the air and on the ground.

It states, “Whoever willfully sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce” is in violation.

We also know how poor people are at identifying aircraft, with several of the “drones” actually being airliners and smaller aircraft. Not to mention, what goes up must come down. So, if you’re in Texas, please reach out to your state legislature and let them know this is a really bad idea.

DJI Mavic 4 Leaks Reveal Innovative Features

Finally, DJI Mavic 4 leaks: DroneXL.co and Jasper Ellens are reporting a new rumor that the Mavic 4 will be able to roll the gimbal up to 180° in both directions. You heard that right—roll! That’s kind of interesting and not something we’ve seen on any drone so far, other than the Inspire series. This would mean you could take native vertical shots with all lenses and even have the ability to record videos upside down. This could make for some quite interesting footage, I think. We’ll have to wait and see.

We’ll see you on Monday for the live next week. There will be no Friday live as we are getting ready to move into our new building. New sets and new looks are coming out very soon. Have a great week!


DroneXL.coをもっと見る

購読すると最新の投稿がメールで送信されます。

声を届ける

提案されている法案は、楽しみ、仕事、安全のためにドローンを使用するあなたの能力を脅かす。その ドローン擁護同盟 私たちと一緒に、あなたの選挙で選ばれた議員に、空を飛ぶ権利を守るよう訴えましょう。

ドローン擁護同盟
今すぐ行動を起こす
Google Newsでフォローしてください!

パート107証明書の取得

Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the パイロット・インスティテュート.私たちは、何千人もの人々が飛行機や商業ドローンパイロットになるのを助けてきました。私たちのコースは、FAAのテストに合格し、あなたの夢を達成するために、業界の専門家によって設計されています。

パイロット・インスティチュート・ドローネクスル

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please お問い合わせ first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the ドローン擁護同盟. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC:DroneXL.coはAmazonアソシエイトであり、対象となる購入から収入を得ることができるアフィリエイトリンクを使用しています。私たちは、あなたの電子メールを販売、共有、貸し出し、またはスパムはありません。

グレッグ・レヴェルディアウ
グレッグ・レヴェルディアウ
記事本文: 134

2件のコメント

    • Fascinating question. I asked Grok:

      Great question! The short answer is: no, you don’t fully “own” the sky above your house, but it’s a bit more nuanced than that.
      In the U.S. (and most places with similar legal systems), property ownership includes rights to the airspace above your land—but only up to a certain point. This idea comes from an old legal principle, “cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos,” which roughly means “whoever owns the soil owns up to the heavens and down to the depths.” Sounds cool, right? But in practice, it’s not that simple anymore.
      Modern law, especially after the rise of aviation, limits how high your ownership extends. Generally, you control the airspace you can reasonably use—think a few hundred feet up, enough for tall trees, a house, maybe a drone hobby. The U.S. Supreme Court tackled this in 1946 with United States v. Causby, where a farmer sued because military planes flying low over his land freaked out his chickens. The court ruled that landowners have rights to the “immediate reaches” of the airspace, but the sky above that—like where planes fly—is public domain, regulated by the government (think FAA rules).
      Above your house, say 500 feet or so (exact numbers vary by jurisdiction), the airspace is typically considered public or under federal control. You can’t stop a plane from flying overhead or claim rent from satellites zipping by. Locally, zoning laws or HOA rules might restrict what you can do with “your” airspace—like no crazy tall towers—but that’s about use, not ownership.
      So, you own some of the sky, but not the wild blue yonder. Does that clarify things? Want me to dig into your local laws or something specific?

コメントを残す

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

jaJapanese