Missouri House Committee Approves Stricter Drone Regulations

Skyrover X1 Fly More Combo Now $682.48 (25%) Off On Amazon With DRONEXL2025 Discount Code

On Monday, the House Special Committee on Homeland Security in Jefferson City unanimously passed several combined pieces of legislation designed to limit the use of drones by both private citizens and law enforcement.

The new bill, created from House Bills 178, 179, and 401, aims to limit the use of drones below 400 feet over private property.

There will be some exceptions, like for the army, for universities doing research, for professional surveillance projects, and so on.

Law enforcement agencies would also be prohibited from gathering information using drones without obtaining a warrant unless in emergency situations such as hostage crises or fires.

The new legislation is a response to several concerns raised during a public hearing in January, including those of farm owners who sought to limit the ability of drones to fly over their property and lobbyists for the agriculture industry.

Gene and Tamara Chastain, farm owners, reportedly testified that hunters using drones to herd deer off their land frightened and scattered their livestock.

Stricter drone regulations increase penatly

The new legislation also increases the penalty for a violation of the existing law that prohibits the use of drones above open-air facilities, such as sports fields or outdoor theaters, from an infraction to a class A misdemeanor.

Opponents of the new legislation, however, expressed concerns about the state government’s authority to broadly regulate drone use by private citizens.

The proposed legislation, however, will not limit the activities of any aircraft flown above 400 feet above ground.

The bill also bans unmanned aircraft from being flown above prisons and mental health facilities in accordance with existing state law.

The stricter drone regulations are in direct conflict with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), that has exclusive authority to regulate aviation safety, the efficiency of the navigable airspace, and air traffic control, among other things.

In a July 2018 statement, the FAA reiterated that, “State and local governments are not permitted to regulate any type of aircraft operations, such as flight paths or altitudes, or the navigable airspace.”

States and local governments are, however, allowed to regulate aircraft landing sites according to the FAA.

Let us know in the comments below what you think of the stricter drone regulations.


Discover more from DroneXL.co

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Check out our Classic Line of T-Shirts, Polos, Hoodies and more in our new store today!

Ad DroneXL e-Store

MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD

Proposed legislation threatens your ability to use drones for fun, work, and safety. The Drone Advocacy Alliance is fighting to ensure your voice is heard in these critical policy discussions.Join us and tell your elected officials to protect your right to fly.

Drone Advocacy Alliance
TAKE ACTION NOW

Get your Part 107 Certificate

Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the Pilot Institute. We have helped thousands of people become airplane and commercial drone pilots. Our courses are designed by industry experts to help you pass FAA tests and achieve your dreams.

pilot institute dronexl

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please contact us first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the Drone Advocacy Alliance. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC: DroneXL.co is an Amazon Associate and uses affiliate links that can generate income from qualifying purchases. We do not sell, share, rent out, or spam your email.

Follow us on Google News!
Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo is a leading drone industry expert and Editor in Chief of DroneXL.co and EVXL.co, where he covers drone technology, industry developments, and electric mobility trends. With over nine years of specialized coverage in unmanned aerial systems, his insights have been featured in The New York Times, The Financial Times, and cited by The Brookings Institute, Foreign Policy, Politico and others.

Before founding DroneXL.co, Kesteloo built his expertise at DroneDJ. He currently co-hosts the PiXL Drone Show on YouTube and podcast platforms, sharing industry insights with a global audience. His reporting has influenced policy discussions and been referenced in federal documents, establishing him as an authoritative voice in drone technology and regulation. He can be reached at haye @ dronexl.co or @hayekesteloo.

Articles: 5506

2 Comments

  1. Is there a link to the text of this legislation?

    Also, you mention “the existing law that prohibits the use of drones above open-air facilities, such as sports fields or outdoor theaters”. Do you have a link to that law?

  2. AUVSI needs to look into this.
    I have reported this garbage law to the FAA.

    As recreational drone pilots, we need to flag and forward these unconstitutional laws to the FAA.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.