Missouri House Committee Approves Stricter Drone Regulations

On Monday, the House Special Committee on Homeland Security in Jefferson City unanimously passed several combined pieces of legislation designed to limit the use of drones by both private citizens and law enforcement.

The new bill, created from House Bills 178, 179, and 401, aims to limit the use of drones below 400 feet over private property.

There will be some exceptions, like for the army, for universities doing research, for professional surveillance projects, and so on.

Law enforcement agencies would also be prohibited from gathering information using drones without obtaining a warrant unless in emergency situations such as hostage crises or fires.

The new legislation is a response to several concerns raised during a public hearing in January, including those of farm owners who sought to limit the ability of drones to fly over their property and lobbyists for the agriculture industry.

Gene and Tamara Chastain, farm owners, reportedly testified that hunters using drones to herd deer off their land frightened and scattered their livestock.

Stricter drone regulations increase penatly

The new legislation also increases the penalty for a violation of the existing law that prohibits the use of drones above open-air facilities, such as sports fields or outdoor theaters, from an infraction to a class A misdemeanor.

Opponents of the new legislation, however, expressed concerns about the state government's authority to broadly regulate drone use by private citizens.

The proposed legislation, however, will not limit the activities of any aircraft flown above 400 feet above ground.

The bill also bans unmanned aircraft from being flown above prisons and mental health facilities in accordance with existing state law.

The stricter drone regulations are in direct conflict with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), that has exclusive authority to regulate aviation safety, the efficiency of the navigable airspace, and air traffic control, among other things.

In a July 2018 statement, the FAA reiterated that, “State and local governments are not permitted to regulate any type of aircraft operations, such as flight paths or altitudes, or the navigable airspace.”

States and local governments are, however, allowed to regulate aircraft landing sites according to the FAA.

Let us know in the comments below what you think of the stricter drone regulations.

Follow DroneXL.co on your Google News feed.

Get your Part 107 Certificate

Pass the test and take to the skies with the Pilot Institute. We have helped thousands of people become airplane and commercial drone pilots. Our courses are designed by industry experts to help you pass FAA tests and achieve your dreams.

pilot institute dronexl

FTC: DroneXL.co uses affiliate links that generate income.* We do not sell, share, rent out, or spam your email, ever. Our email goes out on weekdays around 5:30 p.m.

Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo is the Editor in Chief and Founder of DroneXL.co, where he covers all drone-related news, DJI rumors and writes drone reviews, and EVXL.co, for all news related to electric vehicles. He is also a co-host of the PiXL Drone Show on YouTube and other podcast platforms. Haye can be reached at haye @ dronexl.co or @hayekesteloo.

Articles: 2471


  1. Is there a link to the text of this legislation?

    Also, you mention “the existing law that prohibits the use of drones above open-air facilities, such as sports fields or outdoor theaters”. Do you have a link to that law?

  2. AUVSI needs to look into this.
    I have reported this garbage law to the FAA.

    As recreational drone pilots, we need to flag and forward these unconstitutional laws to the FAA.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap
%d bloggers like this: