Unauthorized Drone Surveillance Leads to Legal Battle in Arkansas

A contentious legal dispute has erupted in Arkansas, centering on the alleged unauthorized use of a drone for surveillance. According to the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, Clean Harbors, a hazardous waste disposal company, is facing serious consequences for a drone flight over a competitor’s facility.

The Drone Incident

In October 2023, Veolia’s subsidiary, Elemental Environmental Solutions, filed a lawsuit against Clean Harbors. The crux of the complaint? A Clean Harbors employee allegedly flew a drone over Veolia’s chemical storage facility in Gum Springs without permission.

Veolia didn’t take this lightly. They documented the flyover, snapping photos to protect their sensitive information and facilities. This wasn’t just a neighborly dispute – it was a potential violation of Arkansas law, which considers using drones for surveillance or gathering info about critical infrastructure without prior written consent unlawful.

Legal Fallout

The unauthorized drone flight has landed Clean Harbors in hot water. A Clark County judge has held the company in contempt of court – for the second time in this case. Why? Clean Harbors failed to meet deposition deadlines and comply with other court orders related to the drone incident.

A Clean Harbors employee, identified as Steve Garcia, reportedly admitted he was “instructed to perform aerial surveillance of Veolia’s property.” This admission has only fueled the legal fire.

Bigger Picture: Drones and Privacy

This case highlights the growing tensions between drone technology and privacy concerns. As drones become more accessible, companies and individuals must navigate complex legal landscapes to ensure their use doesn’t infringe on others’ rights.

DroneXL’s Take

This incident underscores the critical need for drone operators – both commercial and recreational – to understand and respect local laws and privacy concerns. It’s a reminder that the exciting potential of drone technology must be balanced with responsible use.

For more on the intersection of drones and legal issues, check out our recent coverage of drone-related legal developments. As drone technology evolves, so too must our understanding of its proper use in various settings.

What are your thoughts on this case? Do you think companies need clearer guidelines on drone use near sensitive facilities? Share your opinion in the comments below!

The featured image is for illustration purposes only.


Discover more from DroneXL.co

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Check out our Classic Line of T-Shirts, Polos, Hoodies and more in our new store today!

Ad DroneXL e-Store

MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD

Proposed legislation threatens your ability to use drones for fun, work, and safety. The Drone Advocacy Alliance is fighting to ensure your voice is heard in these critical policy discussions.Join us and tell your elected officials to protect your right to fly.

Drone Advocacy Alliance
TAKE ACTION NOW

Get your Part 107 Certificate

Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the Pilot Institute. We have helped thousands of people become airplane and commercial drone pilots. Our courses are designed by industry experts to help you pass FAA tests and achieve your dreams.

pilot institute dronexl

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please contact us first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the Drone Advocacy Alliance. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC: DroneXL.co is an Amazon Associate and uses affiliate links that can generate income from qualifying purchases. We do not sell, share, rent out, or spam your email.

Follow us on Google News!
Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo is a leading drone industry expert and Editor in Chief of DroneXL.co and EVXL.co, where he covers drone technology, industry developments, and electric mobility trends. With over nine years of specialized coverage in unmanned aerial systems, his insights have been featured in The New York Times, The Financial Times, and cited by The Brookings Institute, Foreign Policy, Politico and others.

Before founding DroneXL.co, Kesteloo built his expertise at DroneDJ. He currently co-hosts the PiXL Drone Show on YouTube and podcast platforms, sharing industry insights with a global audience. His reporting has influenced policy discussions and been referenced in federal documents, establishing him as an authoritative voice in drone technology and regulation. He can be reached at haye @ dronexl.co or @hayekesteloo.

Articles: 5550

One comment

  1. While I agree that drones are very powerful tools to some and very nice toys to others… Drones should never ever be allowed to fly over or take any video whatsoever of private property. What’s in my livestock pastures, hay fields, timber tracts and home are no one’s business but my own. I haven’t yet had any problems with drones, but sport aircraft use to take pretty serious liberties over my farm that frightened my livestock and invaded my privacy. If you live in the middle of 500 acres, you should be able to expect to pee off your back porch or sunbathe nude in total privacy. Only people who don’t have that kind of privacy see no value in it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.