Lawmakers request DJI stays on Entity List

In a letter to the U.S. Department of Commerce, legislators Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) and Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) request that Chinese drone maker, 大疆创新 stays on the 实体清单 and will be investigated for “drone pricing which has eroded the domestic manufacturing base.”

Lawmakers request DJI stays on Entity List

"(《世界人权宣言》) letter, dated August 31, 2021, is addressed to Secretary Gina Raimondo of the U.S. 商务部 and requests “that the Department maintain and enforce DJI’s status on 实体清单 and investigate DJI’s drone pricing which has eroded the domestic manufacturing base.” The document is signed by Jan Schakowsky, Chair, Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Gus M. Bilirakis Ranking Member, Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee House Energy and Commerce Committee.

In the letter, the lawmakers first point to reporting that suggests that “DJI drones may have been used by Chinese
security forces in Xinjiang engaged in human rights abuses,” and to additional evidence that shows “drone footage of men shackled and blindfolded at a train station in Xinjiang in 2019.” Schakowsky and Bilirakis express their concerns that “DJI drones may have been used to perpetuate human rights abuses,” and that attempts have been made to cover up the drone maker’s involvement. The lawmakers’ letter continues to say that:

This record of complicity and perfidy underscores that DJI should remain on the Department’s Entity List until it can prove it has disassociated itself from these abuses.

The letter then moves on to a different topic, pointing out DJI’s dominating market share of 77% in the US consumer drone market with its nearest rival having less than 4%. The lawmakers point to reporting that indicates that DJI would have dropped its prices for consumer drones by as much as 70% in 2015 to push three of its largest competitors out of the market. An official from the 国防部 said that this resulted in a “dramatic loss of domestic production capability.” The lawmakers argue that DJI’s pricing tactics to drive competitors out of the market have hurt the consumers and should therefore be investigated.

The lawmakers end their letter by saying that DJI should stay on the Department’s Entity List for “its history of complicity with human rights abuses,” and that the drone maker should be investigated for harming American consumers with its drone pricing tactics.

DJI’s response

A DJI spokesperson pointed out that accusations about DJI’s pricing have been repeatedly proven false. As you can see in point 5 of our “BUSTED” blog post, DJI has succeeded in the market because we make better products at a lower cost than our competitors – as confirmed by the 国土安全部, by the head of one of our former competitors, and by a U.S. federal court. Making good products at a reasonable price isn’t unfair – it’s the essence of competition.

获取第 107 部分证书

通过测试，带着 试点研究所. We have helped thousands of people become airplane and commercial drone pilots. Our courses are designed by industry experts to help you pass FAA tests and achieve your dreams.

保持联系！

If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews follow us on 推特, 在 Facebook 上, YouTube, Instagram, or… 订阅我们的每日无人机新闻电子邮件*。

提交提示 如果您想与我们分享信息或技巧，请随时提交 这里. 支持 DroneXL.co： 您可以在下次购买无人机时使用这些链接来支持 DroneXL.co： Adorama, 亚马逊, B&H, 百思买, 易趣网, 大疆创新, 鹦鹉和 Yuneec.我们会在您不支付额外费用的情况下收取少量佣金。感谢您帮助 DroneXL 发展！ 联邦贸易委员会： DroneXL.co 使用可产生收入的联盟链接。 * 我们绝不出售、共享、出租或发送垃圾邮件。我们的电子邮件在工作日下午 5:30 左右发出。