NOPD Seeks $740K for Drone-as-First-Responder Program While Privacy Groups Sound Alarm

The New Orleans Police Department is pushing to join the rapidly expanding ranks of U.S. law enforcement agencies deploying autonomous drones, requesting $740,000 from the French Quarter Management District to establish a Drone-as-First-Responder program.

The Development: NOPD wants funding for drones and docking stations enabling remote 24/7 deployment to 911 calls, a shift from its current program requiring two pilots on-site.

The Context: Neighboring Jefferson Parish already operates one of the nation’s largest law enforcement drone programs with 23 drones and more than 60 arrests since November.

The Friction: Privacy advocates warn about surveillance overreach, especially given NOPD’s documented use of facial recognition despite a 2022 city ordinance limiting the technology.

NOPD’s DFR proposal targets chronic staffing shortages

The proposal would position autonomous drones at docking stations across the city, enabling remote operators to launch aircraft within seconds of a 911 call. “It gives us the availability to have drones on standby 24 hours a day, seven days a week,” 8th District Captain Samuel Palumbo told the FQMD security committee. The department faces a historic staffing shortage, with 911 response times sometimes stretching past 20 minutes for non-priority calls.

The DFR model has proven effective elsewhere. In Gilbert, Arizona, drones arrived before patrol officers in 35% of calls, sometimes beating ground units by nearly six minutes.

Jefferson Parish provides the regional blueprint

JPSO operates what officials call one of the largest DFR programs in the nation. The $1.5 million annual investment covers 23 Skydio drones at docking stations across unincorporated areas. Since November, the program has assisted with more than 60 arrests.

JPSO insists it is not using facial recognition or license plate readers. Lopinto told reporters the video quality isn’t sharp enough to identify specific individuals.

Privacy groups oppose expansion amid federal immigration concerns

More than a dozen residents opposed the proposal at Monday’s FQMD meeting. Edith Romero of Eye on Surveillance warned that “drones have military grade features like thermal sensors and high definition cameras that pose serious issues to our civil rights and privacy.” Thermal imaging is standard on commercial drones, though privacy advocates argue police deployment raises different concerns.

Romero raised concerns about footage being shared with federal immigration agents. The opposition follows a Washington Post investigation revealing NOPD had used facial recognition alerts from Project NOLA despite city ordinance restrictions.

City Council member JP Morrell questioned whether a neighborhood management district was the appropriate venue for deciding on expanded surveillance. “I don’t think it’s the most public process or venue to explore the expansion of this program,” he said.

Funding remains uncertain

FQMD commissioners indicated they won’t fund the full $740,000 request, which covers five years of equipment and maintenance. They suggested splitting costs with the Downtown Development District and the city. No vote has been scheduled.

DroneXL’s Take

NOPD is playing catch-up. While New York, Las Vegas, and neighboring Jefferson Parish have built sophisticated DFR networks, New Orleans still operates with pilots physically deploying to scenes. That gap matters when you’re a department struggling to fill patrol shifts.

But the privacy concerns aren’t hypothetical. NOPD got caught using facial recognition after the city council restricted it. That history makes every assurance about data handling harder to take at face value. Starting with FQMD funding for a French Quarter pilot actually makes sense – that’s what the district exists for – but citywide expansion will eventually need city council buy-in.

Expect FQMD to fund a smaller pilot covering the French Quarter core. If JPSO’s results hold, pressure for citywide expansion will follow. Whether meaningful oversight comes with it remains the open question.

Editorial Note: This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI to ensure technical accuracy and archive retrieval. All insights, industry analysis, and perspectives were provided exclusively by Haye Kesteloo and our other DroneXL authors, editors, and YouTube partners to ensure the “Human-First” perspective our readers expect.

Last update on 2026-01-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API