DJI Takes Legal Action Against Pentagon Over Military Designation

Skyrover X1 Fly More Combo Now $682.48 (25%) Off On Amazon With DRONEXL2025 Discount Code

DJI, the world’s largest drone manufacturer, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) challenging its designation as a “Chinese military company.” The legal action, initiated on October 18, 2023, seeks to remove DJI from the Pentagon’s list of companies allegedly associated with the Chinese military, as reported by Fox Business.

The Lawsuit and Its Implications

DJI has petitioned a U.S. District Judge in Washington to order its removal from the DOD’s list. The company strongly asserts that it “is neither owned nor controlled by the Chinese military.” This classification has had severe repercussions for DJI, including:

  • Termination of existing contracts by U.S. and international customers
  • Reluctance from potential clients to enter into new agreements
  • A tarnished reputation as a perceived national security threat
  • Exclusion from contracting opportunities with multiple federal government agencies

The drone manufacturer, which produces more than half of all commercial drones used in the United States, claims that this designation has significantly hampered its business operations and market position.

DJI’s Response and Engagement Efforts

Before resorting to legal action, DJI attempted to engage with the Department of Defense for over 16 months. The company states that during this period, it “highlighted numerous deficiencies in the report that formed the basis for the DoD’s decision to list DJI.” However, these efforts proved fruitless, leading DJI to conclude that it had “no alternative other than to seek relief in federal court.”

In its official statement, DJI emphatically denied any military affiliations:

“DJI is not owned or controlled by the Chinese military, and the DoD itself acknowledges that DJI makes consumer and commercial drones, not military drones. DJI is a private company and should not be misclassified as a military company. The company disputes the CMC designation and maintains that it is not affiliated with any military activities.”

Broader Context and Legislative Actions

DJI’s legal challenge comes amid a backdrop of increasing scrutiny of Chinese technology companies operating in the United States. U.S. lawmakers have consistently voiced concerns about potential data transmission, surveillance, and national security risks associated with DJI drones.

These concerns have translated into concrete legislative action. In a significant move last month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that would prohibit new DJI drones from operating within the United States. This bill is currently awaiting consideration in the Senate.

DJI isn’t alone on the Pentagon’s list. Other major Chinese firms, including aviation company AVIC, memory chipmaker YMTC, China Mobile, and energy company CNOOC, are also designated as “Chinese military companies.”

Potential Outcomes and Industry Impact

The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching consequences for the drone industry, particularly for international companies operating in the U.S. market. It may influence future policies regarding the use of foreign-made drones in sensitive applications and potentially reshape the competitive landscape of the U.S. drone market.

DroneXL’s Take

This legal confrontation between DJI and the Pentagon underscores the complex interplay between technological innovation, international trade, and national security concerns in the drone industry. The case highlights the need for transparent, evidence-based assessments of drone technology and its potential risks.

Recent discussions in the data security realm of drones have emphasized the delicate balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding national interests. This lawsuit may serve as a pivotal moment in defining how these competing priorities are balanced in the future.

As this legal battle unfolds, it will undoubtedly be closely watched by industry stakeholders, policymakers, and drone enthusiasts alike. What are your thoughts on this lawsuit and its potential implications for the drone industry? We’d love to hear your perspective in the comments section below.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​


Discover more from DroneXL.co

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Check out our Classic Line of T-Shirts, Polos, Hoodies and more in our new store today!

Ad DroneXL e-Store

MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD

Proposed legislation threatens your ability to use drones for fun, work, and safety. The Drone Advocacy Alliance is fighting to ensure your voice is heard in these critical policy discussions.Join us and tell your elected officials to protect your right to fly.

Drone Advocacy Alliance
TAKE ACTION NOW

Get your Part 107 Certificate

Pass the Part 107 test and take to the skies with the Pilot Institute. We have helped thousands of people become airplane and commercial drone pilots. Our courses are designed by industry experts to help you pass FAA tests and achieve your dreams.

pilot institute dronexl

Copyright © DroneXL.co 2025. All rights reserved. The content, images, and intellectual property on this website are protected by copyright law. Reproduction or distribution of any material without prior written permission from DroneXL.co is strictly prohibited. For permissions and inquiries, please contact us first. DroneXL.co is a proud partner of the Drone Advocacy Alliance. Be sure to check out DroneXL's sister site, EVXL.co, for all the latest news on electric vehicles.

FTC: DroneXL.co is an Amazon Associate and uses affiliate links that can generate income from qualifying purchases. We do not sell, share, rent out, or spam your email.

Follow us on Google News!
Haye Kesteloo
Haye Kesteloo

Haye Kesteloo is a leading drone industry expert and Editor in Chief of DroneXL.co and EVXL.co, where he covers drone technology, industry developments, and electric mobility trends. With over nine years of specialized coverage in unmanned aerial systems, his insights have been featured in The New York Times, The Financial Times, and cited by The Brookings Institute, Foreign Policy, Politico and others.

Before founding DroneXL.co, Kesteloo built his expertise at DroneDJ. He currently co-hosts the PiXL Drone Show on YouTube and podcast platforms, sharing industry insights with a global audience. His reporting has influenced policy discussions and been referenced in federal documents, establishing him as an authoritative voice in drone technology and regulation. He can be reached at haye @ dronexl.co or @hayekesteloo.

Articles: 5506

One comment

  1. I think the US government seeks to ban DJI drones in the US because they don’t want us the citizens to have the same or better technology than the government. DJI makes it easy and affordable for the average consumer.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.